Compare the way a news story is presented in three different newspaper extracts Essay

In this leaven I will compare the way a red-hots invoice is presented in three different newspaper extracts. conjure A is from The quantify on Tuesday 4th September, extract B is withal from The Times on Tuesday 4th September extract b is an editorial, extract c is from The shielder G-2 on Friday 7th September extract c is a bowel movement page graphic. All three extracts cover the event that happened on Monday third September between the Catholics and the Protestants. The incidents occurred when Catholics trail children from holy Cross Primary school began there new school year.The children had to walk in between barriers of panoplied police, just to get to school. The incident started when republicans was accused of knocking over both men on ladders who were putting loyalists flags on lampposts out side Holy Cross Primary School before the marching season in June. In all three extracts there is a powerful opening night statement to catch the indorsers attention, extr act A uses a pun the progeny girls of the Holy Cross Primary School in Belfast began their new school year yesterday with a horrifying lesson in sectarian hatred.This is trying to say that in schools children are learning roughly hatred instead of being taught other lessons much(prenominal) as get along with everyone regardless of whether they are Protestant or Catholic. Extract B also uses a powerful opening statement Northern Ireland has only again shown its Gorgon-face of bigotry. This states that once again Northern Ireland has shown its monstrous side, whereas extract C states Why it takes the image of a child to wake the world this makes the commentator to feel sorry for the children and is an rhetorical question.Extract A has a big, rank(a) headline it states Children walk a gauntlet of Belfast hatred which makes the reader to want to read on. Extract B states Children in the middle this is also trying to get the attention of the reader, whereas extract C doesnt arri ve at a headline because it is a front-page graphic. Extract A uses a accredited amount of emotive dustup to make the audience feel trustworthy emotions.Extract A states screamed at not shouted at merely screamed at, spat at use of abuse on children, sobbing uncontrollably this states that the children werent crying they were uncontrollably sobbing due to the riots. The emotive expression in extract A has a certain effect on the audience, it makes the reader feel sympathetic towards the children. Extract B also uses a certain amount of emotive language using words such as Gorgon-face of bigotry and hideous spectacle. These words are usually associated with beasts, therefrom this statement is trying to show that what is happening, should be considered as monstrous and that the victims of this colossus are innocent children. Surrounded and overwhelming are adjectives meaning that there is no way out for the victims, showing that the whole situation cannot be resolved. Extract B is an editorial and is the editors point of view not the facts. Extract C doesnt use a lot of emotive language mainly because it is a front-page graphic from a supplement.