Case Study Analysis

respectable Case Study 2 Sally Goes to naturalize Shanda Woody Montreat College Ethical Case Study 2 Sally Goes to inculcate A fundamental aspect of ethics in commission is the rightfield to informed consent. Informed consent reflects respect for the client as an case-by-case and promotes self-governing during the counseling process (Pope & Melba, 2011). The Ameri set up Counseling Association Ethical finality reservation Model provides counsels with a blueprint for reservation honourable stopping points plot of ground placing an emphasis on values and principles and is appropriate in resolution the respectable dilemma contained in this case study (Miller & Davis, 1996).ACA Model The ACA write in code of Ethics states, when counselors are faced with ethical dilemmas that are difficult to resolve, they are expected to engage in a carefully visualiseed ethical decision making good example (ACA, 2005). This model directly applies the ACA Code of Ethics while combinin g Kitcheners (1984) virtue ethics, counselor consultation, and self-determination (Corey, Corey & Callahan, 2011). The model also includes the go away of Van Hoose and Paradise (1979), Stadler (986), Haas and Malouf (1989), Forester-Miller and Rubenstein (1992), and Sileo and Kopala (1993).The ACA model encourages a counseling relationship establish on trust and states when counselors are faced with an ethical dilemma they gull careful consideration to the decision making process (Corey, Corey & Callahan, 2011). ACA Decision Making Model Process The ACA model identifies Kitcheners vanadium moral principles as the infrastructure of the decision making process and they include autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, justice, and fidelity (Forester-Miller & Davis, 1996). Upon eviewing these ethical principles, the model outlines seven maltreats in the decision making process including report the problem apply the ACA Code of Ethics, determine the nature of the dilemma, determine a possible course of briskness, consider potential consequences for all options and determine a course of action, evaluate the course of action, and implement the action (Forester-Miller, & Davis, 1996). The first step in the model is to identify the problem by gathering as much knowledge as possible.It is important to outline the facts and eliminate whatsoever assumptions so that the counselor can determine the ethical dilemma and the course of action needed. In this phase, the model suggest asking questions such as Is the issue cerebrate to me and what I am doing or not doing? Is it related to the client and/or the clients family? Is the issue an ethical, legal or clinical problem? (Forester-Miller, & Davis, 1996) The next step is to apply the ACA Code of Ethics. If there is a standard or standards that apply, the model recommends borrowing the course of action indicated which should lead to a solution.It is important that counselors be familiar with the ethical standards an d perceive the implications (Forester-Miller et al. ,1996). The next step in the model is to determine the nature and dimensions of the dilemma. In this step, the counselor would consider the moral principles and decide which principles apply, then review either professional literature to help reach a decision, consult with colleagues and new(prenominal) professionals, and seek out assistance from state and national associations.At this point in the decision making process, the counselor may want to refer to Kitcheners (1984) five moral principles to ensure autonomy, justice, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fidelity are being used as a carry in the decision making process. (Forester-Miller et al. , 1996) Next, counselors begin to penetration and create possible solutions for the ethical dilemma. After this stage, counselors allow for consider the information gathered during previous stages, assess each option carefully and consider the implications for the course of action. T he ACA model stresses the mportance of eliminating options that will not result in the best outcome and to avoid making decisions that will be more tangled that the situation at hand. (Forester-Miller et al. , 1996) The final two stages include evaluating and implementing the selected course of action. At this point, it is imperative that the counselors consider any new ethical dilemmas that may pee-pee been created by the decision made and if it is determined more harm will come to the client the counselor must(prenominal) go back to the number one and reevaluate the process to ensure the best possible outcome.Once it has been determined that this ethical decision made is appropriate, the counselor will implement the plan and follow up with the situation to ensure the course had the anticipated results. Ethical Decision and Implications After reviewing the ACA decision making model, the counselor would choose to discuss the aspiration of treatment, the goals, procedures and t echniques provided during the therapeutic relationship (Corey & Herlihy, 2006). Any testing or diagnosis needs to be explained as the client has a right to be an active participant.Implementation of the ACA Code of Ethics A. 2. a Informed Consent which states clients curb a right to choose and remain in the therapeutic relationship and counselors have an obligation to inform clients of the ongoing counseling process is imperative(ACA, 2005). At this juncture, the counselor would also want to refer to ACA Code of Ethics E. 3. a which states counselors must explain the nature and purpose of assessments in a way that the clients can understand (ACA, 2005).Reflections on the Decision Making Process Upholding the ethical standards of the counseling professional can be a difficult task delinquent to a myriad of reasons. An ethical dilemma can prove to be overwhelming and complex but if the counselor utilizes an effective decision making model, refers to the ACA Code of Ethics as a guid e, and upholds professional ethics by maintaining the best interest of the client the result should be positive and a learning experience for all involved.References Forester-Miller, H. & Davis, T. (1996). A practitioners guide to ethical decision making. American Counseling Association (1996) Corey, G. , Corey, M. , & Callahan, P. , (2011). Issues and ethics in the helping professions. 8TH edition. American Counseling Association (2005). Code of Ethics, Alexandria, VA Author. Corey, G. , & Herlihy, B. , (2006). ACA ethical standards casebook. 6th edition Pope .