Abortion and the Privacy Amendment Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive T

stillbirth and the Privacy Amendment   A U.S. citizens right to privacy was first discussed in an 1890 Harvard fair play Review article in which two Boston lawyers, Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren, defined it as the right to be let alone. Since then, the right to privacy has provided the home for a stream of revolutionary and controversial integral recitations by courts across the unify States, culminating in the U.S. Supreme Courts Roe v. walk decision in 1973. Although decisions hurt come down in favor of a right to privacy, they argon largely based on a broad and disputed definition of the Fourteenth Amendment. With the plethora of privacy issues that confront courts and policymakers in the current training age, the time for an amendment specifying the inalienable right to privacy is quickly approaching.   Despite in all the social, medical and religious undertones in the abortion debate, the Roe v. Wade opinion, write by Justice Harry Blackmun, has stood fo r twenty-four years on the basis that the right to choose an abortion is part of a womans right to in-person privacy, a right that Blackmun stated is founded in the Fourteenth Amendments concept of individualised liberty and restrictions upon state action.   However, somewhat contest that the Fourteenth Amendment does not powerfully identify an inalienable right to privacy as a constitutional right. Justice Rehnquist, in the dissenting 1973 opinion, wrote, the Court necessarily has had to find within the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment a right that was apparently completely un-known to the drafters of the Amendment. For this rea-son, some scholars, as well as members of the current Court, consider Roe v. Wade a fragile decision that ... ...s is a person.   This would not be an abortion amendment. Instead, it would harbor citizens from intrusions into all parts of their lives. Technology and computers have opened peoples consign cabinets and family photo albums, and the information revolution has just begun to reinvent the world. The privacy amendment could protect celebrities from an over-zealous press and individual citizens from governmental gene demeans or medical record banks. It could accord the courts to decide what information can be released for the public good, and it could allow the future issues of privacy to be solved with respect to personal rights. Without an amendment, the join States could become increasingly dependent on a questionable interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, leaving citizens standing naked under the beam of a roaming technology spotlight.